In this context, it should be noted that the EU Citizens Directive has been transposed in the UNITED Kingdom through secondary legislation regulations. However, it would be wrong to conclude that it would therefore be fair to also implement the civil rights provisions of the Withdrawal Agreement by means of settlements. A directive is integrated into the protection of the EU`s supranational judicial system. If national law does not comply with the Directive, it can be used directly. Doubts as to its interpretation may be resolved by preliminary rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Failure by a Member State to comply may result in enforcement measures and financial penalties by the Court of Justice of the European Union or damages by the national court. As has just been analysed, this comprehensive system is not available for non-compliance with the provisions of the Withdrawal Agreement on citizens` rights. The “supranational character” of his civil rights is limited and subject to considerable uncertainty as to their application. In the absence of adequate supranational control, EU citizens need a double guarantee: direct effect, on the one hand, and legislative protection against administrative interference with their rights, on the other.” Where this Agreement provides for the application of Union law in the United Kingdom, it shall produce, vis-à-vis and the United Kingdom, the same legal effects as it produces in the Union and its Member States. In particular, Union citizens and United Kingdom nationals may rely directly on the provisions contained in or referred to in Part Two. Provisions incompatible or inconsistent with this Part shall not apply. The Withdrawal Agreement is a complex text that refers to other EU texts such as the Citizens Directive and the regulations on the coordination of social security systems. Although it grants individual rights, it is drafted in such a way that it is addressed to the United Kingdom and the 27 Member States.
Some of these provisions also leave some room for manoeuvre in the way the UK and the EU27 will set the targets set. 31 That statement merely seemed to conceal the United Kingdom`s initial negotiating position that it would not accept direct effect, as was noted in point 3 of the `Technical Note: Implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement`. July 2017) states: “It would be both inappropriate and unnecessary for the agreement to oblige the UK to include the notion of direct effect of the Union in its national law. The same substantive result can be achieved if the Withdrawal Agreement obliges the United Kingdom to grant certain rights to citizens and if the United Kingdom adopts national laws that have the effect of conferring those rights. Not only will EU citizens be able to enforce these rights through the UK`s national legal system, but compliance with the UK`s international obligations can also be enforced through all the mechanisms provided for in the dispute settlement agreement,” said , visited on 15 July 2018. Moreover, this paragraph has not been colored green, suggesting that there is no agreement on how the UK should guarantee the “supranational character” of citizens` rights. .